![]() Windows users, having encountered Linux file managers for the first time, they immediately call them "wretched", or some other words that cannot be printed. I can't find any other logical explanation. Here it is appropriate to pay attention to the reason - probably, multitasking is so unusual for the user on the system where these file managers work, that people prefer to work with ONE program that combines the functions of MANY programs. For FAR and Total Commander, games are made, viewers of files of various formats, mail clients- you can find anything. There were peculiar subcultures of these products. Both products, thanks to their plugin-supporting architecture, have become overgrown with add-ons. The world developed, Windows came - two titans appeared - FAR and Windows Commander, later renamed Total Commander. When the classic Norton Commander was replaced by the no less classic Volkov Commander, everyone rejoiced greatly, and with the advent of DOS Navigator, there was no limit to enthusiasm. At that time, the file manager really had to include the widest range of possibilities, since most of them worked then in DOS, and DOS is by no means a multitasking system, although multitasking was relatively emulated in it with the help of resident programs sitting in random access memory and from time to time giving signs of life. Indeed, why does a file manager need a lot of functions? Or rather, why does it need functions other than the direct purpose of the product? If we turn back a few pages of history, we find there a young man - apparently a student - who sits in front of a 14-inch, as they used to say, "VGA-monitor" and quickly rearranges floppy disks in a three-inch drive. ![]() ![]() As a result, one side participating in the dispute authoritatively declares that the truth lies in the console alone, while the other side gets bored and evades further discussion. GUI file managersĪnd if, when talking about managers for Windows and DOS, the number of various functions, with which the product is equipped, then in the case of file managers for Linux, the situation is diametrically opposite, that is, the fewer various functions, the better. File managers for linux and their features. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |